He is richest who is content with the least, for content is the wealth of nature.
Source: moneyisnotimportant
Source: Gawker
Stephen Colberts The Word segment on The Pursuit of Angriness.
A good start, I welcome the day that the last state sees reason!
The government is corrupt
And we’re on so many drugs
With the radio on and the curtains drawn
We’re trapped in the belly of this horrible machine
And the machine is bleeding to death
Dead Flag Blues by Godspeed You Black Emporer
More News Less Filler,
http://www.antislavery.org/english/slavery_today/default.aspx http://www.zcommunications.org/znet http://www.democracynow.org/ http://www.hrw.org/ http://mirror.wikileaks.info/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.stratfor.com/ http://www.propublica.org/ http://freedomainradio.com/Home.aspx
Free Mobile Applications-
The Huffington PostProPublicaCausesFreeDomainRadioStratforDemocracy Now
Stefan Molyneux provides a gruesomely honest analysis of the statist reaction to WikiLeaks.
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature, and has no chance of being free unless made or kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
All control is predicated by the illusion of choice, let’s take the above photo for example,
You walk into this empty auditorium, the man sweeping the floor says that you may sit anywhere you like but you must sit in a chair.
Most people when presented with this scenario will find a chair that suits them and sit until they forget how to stand, never for a moment considering that it was the illusion of choice that allowed this man to control them.
So… same scenario, only this time it is a policeman giving the order for no obvious reason i.e. no imminent danger, however rather than allowing for even the illusion of choice, he instructs you to sit in the third seat in the fourth row.
Given the latter scenario I firmly believe that most among us would exercise their actual freedom to choose by either, A. Sitting immediately on the floor, or B. Selecting a different chair. Still more if not all of us would instantly recognize that an explicit right of freedom had been taken from us.
So there it is, a man with a broom was able to accomplish what a man with a gun could not, simply by providing us with the appearance of an option, in fact, I would consider the Police Officer the more honest of the two men as he was at least forth right with his intentions.
So you see, Humanity will never be free, so long as we are content to feel free, so sit down or stand up, just remember who’s holding the broom.



